RESEARCH · MAY 2026

The 2026 Mexico Labor Cost Index

State-by-State Total Cost of Employment for US Companies

A primary-source research report by Start-Ops Mexico. Methodology and live calculator: mexico-labor-cost-calculator.

Executive Summary

The salary number a US company sees on a Mexican recruiter’s spreadsheet, when properly loaded with employer-side mandatory contributions and accruals, is 30 to 34 percent below the fully-loaded cost of employment in 2026 — rising to 40 to 44 percent once you include the 10% PTU profit share. That gap — between gross salary and total cost — is the most consequential, and the most consistently misquoted, number in the entire nearshoring conversation.

This report calculates, state by state, what it actually costs a US company to employ a Mexican worker in 2026. We use the values in force as of the publication date: the UMA (Unidad de Medida y Actualización) at $117.31 MXN daily, up 3.75% year-over-year; the general minimum wage at $315.04 MXN/day (a monthly floor of $9,451) and the Frontera Norte minimum wage at $440.87 MXN/day ($13,226 monthly), both in force since January 1; and the 2026 column of the eight-year graduated employer pension contribution (Cesantía y Vejez) that ratchets up each year until 2030.

Three findings matter most. First, for a senior software developer earning $60,000 MXN/month in 2026, the all-in employer cost ranges from $78,235 MXN/month in the four lowest-tax states (Chiapas, Colima, Guerrero, Morelos at 2.00% ISN) to $79,652 MXN/month in Baja California at 4.25% ISN — a burden of 30.4% to 32.8% on top of gross salary, rising to 40.4% to 42.8% with PTU. Second, the constitutional reform passed in March 2026 that reduces the standard workweek from 48 to 40 hours by 2030 will add an effective 16 to 17 percent to per-employee labor costs if salaries hold flat, the single largest forward-looking cost movement on the horizon. Third, the most-cited mistake we see in US buyers’ models is using the 2030 final-state CV rate instead of the 2026 phased rate, which overstates the employer pension cost by roughly 58% at the top tier.

The numbers below are computed from primary sources — DOF publications, the LSS, the LFT, INFONAVIT’s authorizing law, and each state’s Ley de Hacienda. All four representative roles are modeled at IMSS Risk Class 2 (1.13%, the default for office and most service work), with the CV employer rate applied at the correct UMA tier for each worker’s SBC, and federal contributions capped at the 25-UMA SBC ceiling per LSS Art. 28. Journalists, analysts, and HR teams should treat this report as a citable baseline for 2026.

Quotable findings

“The gap between Mexican gross salary and the fully-loaded cost of employment is 30 to 34 percent before PTU — or 40 to 44 percent with the 10% profit share. US buyers who model the salary number alone are off by tens of thousands of dollars per hire per year.”

“By 2030, hiring five employees in Mexico will cost what hiring six costs today — the 40-hour workweek reform is the largest forward-looking cost movement nearshoring buyers aren’t pricing in.”

“Baja California’s payroll tax is more than double Chiapas’s. For a 50-person team at the senior-developer level, that’s roughly $850,000 MXN per year in employer tax alone.”

“The UMA went up 3.75 percent in 2026. Anyone who budgeted Mexican labor in 2025 needs to re-budget — every IMSS contribution is indexed to it.”

“The graduated pension contribution still has four more annual increases ahead of it. The 2026 number is not the final number.”

“Mexico’s general minimum wage rose 26.6 percent in two years to $315.04 MXN/day — a monthly floor of $9,451 MXN. The arbitrage story is real, but it is no longer the ‘cheap labor’ story of a decade ago.”

National Headline Numbers

The four roles below are representative of the hires US companies actually make in Mexico in 2026. We compute the all-in monthly employer cost for each, using the national-average ISN (Impuesto Sobre Nóminas — state payroll tax) of 3.00%, a Risk Class 2 IMSS premium (1.13%, the default for office and most service work), and the 2026 CV (Cesantía y Vejez) phase rates from the eight-year DOF 16-12-2020 transitional schedule applied at the correct tier for each worker’s SBC.

The Factory Worker column uses a gross salary of $9,500 MXN/month — just above the 2026 general minimum wage monthly floor of $9,451 MXN ($315.04/day × 30). For roles in Frontera Norte (the border zone), the minimum is $13,226 MXN/month. Operations Manager federal contributions are capped at the 25-UMA SBC ceiling ($87,983 MXN/month) per LSS Art. 28, which is why the burden percentage flattens at the top of the salary distribution.

All figures are monthly, in MXN, with USD equivalents at $17.50/USD (see Methodology for FX note). Employer contributions are calculated against the SBC (Salario Base de Cotización), which integrates the daily salary with 15 days of aguinaldo (LFT Art. 87) and the 25% prima vacacional on 12 days of vacation (LFT Art. 80, Art. 76) for an integration factor of approximately 1.0493 in year one.

ComponentFactory WorkerJunior DeveloperSenior DeveloperOperations Manager
Gross monthly salary (MXN)$9,500$30,000$60,000$90,000
Gross monthly salary (USD)$543$1,714$3,429$5,143
IMSS employer (Class 2, incl. Retiro 2%)$1,479$3,350$6,098$8,283
INFONAVIT (5% of SBC, 25-UMA cap)$498$1,574$3,148$4,399
CV (2026 phase, tier-based)$478$2,365$4,730$6,610
ISN (3.00% national avg)$299$944$1,889$2,833
Aguinaldo accrual (15 days)$396$1,250$2,500$3,750
Prima vacacional accrual$79$250$500$750
Total monthly cost (MXN)$12,729$39,733$78,865$116,625
Total monthly cost (USD)$727$2,270$4,506$6,664
Burden on gross salary34.0%32.4%31.4%29.6%
Burden including PTU (10%)44.0%42.4%41.4%39.6%

Three notes on this table. First, the IMSS line aggregates eight items defined in LSS Articles 25, 73-74, 106, 107, 147, 168, and 211: cuota fija (20.4% of UMA daily, a flat amount of $717.94/month regardless of salary), excedente (1.10% of SBC above 3 UMA), prestaciones en dinero (0.70%), gastos médicos pensionados (1.05%), invalidez y vida (1.75%), guarderías (1.00%), risk premium (1.13% at Class 2), and Retiro (2.00% of SBC). For the Factory Worker, the cuota fija dominates and the excedente is zero because the SBC ($9,968/month, or 2.83 UMA daily) does not exceed the 3 UMA threshold.

Second, the CV (Cesantía y Vejez) rate is tier-based per DOF 16-12-2020 Cuarto Transitorio. For 2026, the employer rate is 4.799% on SBC in the 2.51–3.00 UMA tier (Factory Worker at $9,500) and 7.513% at 4.01+ UMA (all three office roles, which sit at 8.94, 17.89, and 26.84 UMA respectively). Reports that apply the top-tier 7.513% to a minimum-wage worker overstate the cost; reports that apply the 3.150% floor to higher earners understate it.

Third, PTU (Participación de los Trabajadores en las Utilidades) — the constitutionally-mandated 10% profit share — is a real annualized employer cost but it is paid against profits, not against payroll. Most US buyers exclude it from monthly burden calculations and then are surprised in May of the following year. We show it both ways. The capped version (three months of salary or the company’s three-year PTU average, whichever is higher, per the 2021 outsourcing reform amendment to LFT Art. 127) puts a ceiling on the exposure, but the headline number is 10% of taxable profits attributable to the Mexican entity.

For a senior software developer at $60,000 MXN gross, the realistic 2026 all-in monthly cost is $78,865 MXN excluding PTU at the 3.00% national-average ISN, or roughly $84,865 MXN including PTU accrual at the 10%-of-salary approximation. That’s $4,506 to $4,849 USD per month — still a meaningful arbitrage versus US engineering rates, but materially higher than the $3,429 gross salary number most surveys cite.

State-by-State Cost Table

The table below shows the 2026 ISN (state payroll tax) for all 32 Mexican federal entities and the resulting total monthly employer cost for a senior software developer at $60,000 MXN gross. The ISN line item is the single largest source of cross-state variance: at the extremes, Baja California’s 4.25% rate is more than double the 2.00% paid in Chiapas, Colima, Guerrero, and Morelos. For a 50-person engineering team at this salary level, the state-level ISN delta alone is approximately $850,000 MXN per year.

ISN rates below are taken from each state’s Ley de Hacienda as in force on the publication date. Rates do change — Mexico City raised its rate from 3.00% to 4.00% on certain payrolls in prior years, and several states have considered increases as part of 2026 budget cycles — so always verify before signing a multi-year lease or hiring plan.

State2026 ISN RateMonthly Total Cost (Senior Dev, $60K MXN)USD Equivalent
Chiapas2.00%$78,235$4,471
Colima2.00%$78,235$4,471
Guerrero2.00%$78,235$4,471
Morelos2.00%$78,235$4,471
Tabasco2.50%$78,550$4,489
Aguascalientes3.00%$78,865$4,506
Campeche3.00%$78,865$4,506
Chihuahua3.00%$78,865$4,506
Coahuila3.00%$78,865$4,506
Durango3.00%$78,865$4,506
Estado de México3.00%$78,865$4,506
Guanajuato3.00%$78,865$4,506
Hidalgo3.00%$78,865$4,506
Jalisco3.00%$78,865$4,506
Mexico City (CDMX)3.00%$78,865$4,506
Michoacán3.00%$78,865$4,506
Nayarit3.00%$78,865$4,506
Nuevo León3.00%$78,865$4,506
Oaxaca3.00%$78,865$4,506
Puebla3.00%$78,865$4,506
Querétaro3.00%$78,865$4,506
San Luis Potosí3.00%$78,865$4,506
Sinaloa3.00%$78,865$4,506
Sonora3.00%$78,865$4,506
Tamaulipas3.00%$78,865$4,506
Tlaxcala3.00%$78,865$4,506
Veracruz3.00%$78,865$4,506
Yucatán3.00%$78,865$4,506
Zacatecas3.00%$78,865$4,506
Baja California Sur4.00%$79,494$4,542
Quintana Roo4.00%$79,494$4,542
Baja California4.25%$79,652$4,552

The most important observation in this table is the flatness of the middle band. Twenty-five of 32 states sit at exactly 3.00% ISN. The action is at the tails: four states at 2.00%, one at 2.50%, two at 4.00%, and Baja California alone at 4.25%. For US companies optimizing for labor tax burden, the four 2.00% states are worth modeling — but each comes with tradeoffs on talent density (Chiapas and Guerrero have thin engineering pools relative to Jalisco or Nuevo León) and on infrastructure that aren’t visible in a payroll spreadsheet.

The other observation: the ISN range, end-to-end, is only $1,417 MXN/month per employee — about 1.8% of total cost. State payroll tax matters at scale, but it is not the dominant cost lever. The dominant levers are the federal IMSS/INFONAVIT contributions, which are constant across states, and the role/salary level itself.

The 5 Costs US Buyers Most Underestimate

After 200+ scoping conversations with US buyers in the last 18 months, the same five line items show up missing — or misquoted — in their internal models. In order of severity:

1. IMSS Risk Class variation (LSS Art. 73-74). Every Mexican employer is classified into one of five risk classes for occupational accident insurance. The maximum premium ranges from 0.54% of SBC at Class 1 (office work) to 7.59% at Class 5 (mining, heavy industry, construction). Most US sources cite the Class 1 or Class 2 number and treat it as universal. A medical-device manufacturer modeling Class 2 when their CIIU code lands them in Class 4 is understating IMSS by roughly 3.5 percentage points of SBC. What to do: confirm the CIIU classification of the actual work before modeling. This report uses Risk Class 2 (1.13%) for all four representative roles; manufacturing and field operations should be re-modeled at their actual class.

2. The CV (Cesantía y Vejez) graduated table — 2026 vs. 2030, AND the tier matters. The 2020 pension reform (DOF 16-12-2020 Cuarto Transitorio) ratchets employer pension contributions up annually from 2023 to 2030 AND varies the rate by tier of worker SBC. At the top tier (4.01+ UMA), the rate climbs from 4.241% in 2023 to 11.875% in 2030. The 2026 top-tier rate is 7.513%, but a minimum-wage worker in the 2.51–3.00 UMA tier pays only 4.799% — a 36% lower rate. Most US-published “Mexico labor cost” guides cite the 2030 final-state top-tier rate as if it applied universally. What to do: model the year you’re hiring in, identify each worker’s SBC tier in UMA, and price in the trajectory if you’re committing past 2028.

3. PTU (profit sharing — LFT Art. 117-131). Mexican employers distribute 10% of pre-tax profits to employees annually. The 2021 outsourcing reform capped individual PTU at the higher of (a) three months of the employee’s salary or (b) the average PTU the employee received over the previous three years. US buyers routinely omit this from modeling because it doesn’t appear on the monthly payroll line. For a profitable Mexican operation, PTU adds approximately 8 to 10 percent to fully-loaded annual labor cost. What to do: accrue monthly against expected profit and disclose it in your annual budget. Surprise PTU in May is one of the most common ways CFOs lose trust in Mexican operations.

4. Aguinaldo and prima vacacional combined (LFT Art. 87 and Art. 80). Aguinaldo is the mandatory year-end bonus: a minimum of 15 days of salary, paid by December 20. Prima vacacional is a 25% premium on the salary paid during vacation days (12 days minimum in year one, scaling up per LFT Art. 76 to 30 days by year 30 of service). Together these add roughly 5.5% to base salary cost in year one and climb steadily with tenure. What to do: treat both as monthly accruals, not annual surprises. The accrual is also folded into SBC for IMSS/INFONAVIT/CV calculations, so leaving it out understates the federal contribution lines too.

5. State ISN variance — but mostly as a planning input, not a runtime cost. As shown in the state table, ISN ranges from 2.00% to 4.25%. For most US buyers the more relevant question isn’t “what does ISN cost me in State X” but “is ISN a reason to pick State X over State Y.” At a 50-person team at the senior-developer level, the gap between a 2.00% state and Baja California’s 4.25% is roughly $850,000 MXN per year — meaningful, but rarely the deciding factor against talent density, real estate, and proximity to a USMCA border crossing. What to do: model ISN, but don’t let it lead the site-selection decision.

Year-Over-Year Movement: What Changed From 2024 to 2026

Three indexed inputs to Mexican employer cost moved between 2024 and 2026, and a US company’s 2024 hire is materially more expensive in 2026.

UMA — the index that drives every IMSS contribution line

YearUMA Daily (MXN)YoY Change
2024$108.57
2025$113.07+4.14%
2026$117.31+3.75%

Cumulative 2024→2026: +8.05%. Every contribution line that’s expressed as a percentage of UMA — most importantly the IMSS cuota fija at 20.4% of UMA daily, and the SBC excedente threshold of 3 UMA — climbs with this index. For employees near the minimum wage tier, this is the dominant cost mover.

Minimum wage

YearGeneral (MXN/day)Frontera Norte (MXN/day)
2024$248.93$374.89
2025$278.80$419.88
2026$315.04$440.87

The general minimum wage rose from $248.93 in 2024 to $315.04 in 2026 — a 26.6% cumulative increase over two years. Frontera Norte (the border zone) tracks slightly differently and remains roughly 40% above the general rate. For factory and entry-level service work, the minimum wage is the labor cost.

CV (Cesantía y Vejez) phase — the graduated employer pension contribution

The 2020 reform schedule ratcheted the top-tier (4.01+ UMA) employer rate as follows:

Year4.01+ UMA Tier Rate
20234.241%
20245.331%
20256.422%
20267.513%
20278.603%
20289.694%
202910.784%
203011.875%

For a senior developer at $60,000 MXN/month, the CV contribution alone has risen from roughly $3,160 MXN/month in 2024 to $4,729 MXN/month in 2026 — a $1,569 MXN/month increase per employee, purely from the pension phase-in. Over a 25-person engineering team that’s nearly $471,000 MXN/year in net new employer cost between 2024 and 2026 with no salary change.

The framing for journalists: the 2025 hire who looked like a great deal is, in 2026, between 4% and 7% more expensive at the same salary — entirely from federal indexation and the pension reform schedule. None of this is a discretionary cost.

The 40-Hour Workweek Reform

In March 2026, Mexico approved the constitutional amendment to LFT Art. 61 reducing the standard workweek from 48 hours to 40 hours, phased in gradually through 2030. The first reduction (to 46 hours) takes effect January 1, 2027, with subsequent two-hour annual reductions until the 40-hour week is in force.

The structural cost implication is straightforward and large. A worker producing the same output in 40 hours that previously took 48 hours represents a 20% productivity gain implied by the law. Unless that productivity gain materializes in practice — and across most service and manufacturing settings the evidence is that it partially does, but not fully — the cost shows up somewhere. Three places it can land:

  1. Salaries hold flat; companies hire more headcount to maintain output. This is the most likely outcome for production-line and shift-based operations. Effective labor cost rises by approximately 48/40 − 1 = 20% to maintain coverage, with overhead per worker (IMSS minimum contributions, INFONAVIT, ISN, recruiting, supervision) adding another 2-3 percentage points on top.
  2. Hourly salaries rise to compensate workers for the lost income. Roughly a 20% increase to monthly compensation to keep take-home pay constant. This drags the IMSS/INFONAVIT/CV lines up proportionally, since all are calculated against SBC.
  3. Output drops. The unspoken third option. For roles where 48 to 40 is genuinely a productivity reset — knowledge work, design, engineering — this may be the actual outcome, with cost effectively borne in deferred deliverables rather than payroll.

In practice, US-facing operations will mostly see a blend of options 1 and 2, with the realistic effective increase to per-employee fully-loaded labor cost landing in the 16% to 17% range by 2030.

The quotable framing: by 2030, hiring five employees in Mexico will cost what hiring six costs today.

US buyers signing leases or making multi-year nearshoring commitments in 2026 should price the workweek reform into their 2027-2030 cost trajectory. The change is not optional, not negotiable, and the implementation timeline has already begun.

Run Your Own Numbers

The figures above are computed from the same dataset that powers the live Mexico Labor Cost Calculator. Use it to model your own scenario by state, role mix, salary, and seniority — and download a branded PDF report for your CFO or board.

Methodology

Primary sources (federal):

  • UMA — Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI), published annually in the Diario Oficial de la Federación, in force February 1. 2026 value: $117.31 MXN daily.
  • Minimum wage — Comisión Nacional de los Salarios Mínimos (CONASAMI), published in DOF in December, in force January 1. 2026 general: $315.04 MXN/day ($9,451 monthly at 30 days); Frontera Norte: $440.87 MXN/day ($13,226 monthly).
  • IMSS employer contributions — Ley del Seguro Social: Art. 25 (gastos médicos pensionados, 1.05%), Art. 28 (SBC ceiling of 25 UMA, applied to all federal contribution lines), Art. 73-74 (risk class), Art. 106 fr. I (cuota fija, 20.4% of UMA daily), Art. 106 fr. II (excedente, 1.10% on SBC over 3 UMA), Art. 107 (prestaciones en dinero, 0.70%), Art. 147 (invalidez y vida, 1.75%), Art. 168 fr. I (Retiro, 2.00%), Art. 168 fr. II (Cesantía y Vejez per the phased schedule, tier-based by worker SBC), Art. 211 (guarderías, 1.00%).
  • CV (Cesantía y Vejez) phase-in schedule — DOF 16-12-2020, Cuarto Transitorio del Decreto que reforma la LSS y la Ley de los Sistemas de Ahorro para el Retiro. Employer tier rates ratchet annually from 2023 through 2030. For 2026: 3.150% at ≤1 UMA, scaling to 7.513% at 4.01+ UMA. We apply the rate corresponding to each worker’s actual SBC in UMA, not a single rate across all workers.
  • INFONAVIT — Ley del INFONAVIT Art. 29 fr. II. Employer contribution is 5.00% of SBC, capped at 25 UMA per LSS Art. 28.
  • Aguinaldo — Ley Federal del Trabajo Art. 87. Statutory minimum: 15 days of salary, paid by December 20.
  • Prima vacacional — LFT Art. 80. 25% premium on vacation-period salary.
  • Vacation — LFT Art. 76 (as amended December 2022, in force January 1, 2023). 12 days in year one, scaling to 30 days at 30 years of service.
  • 40-hour workweek reform — Constitutional amendment to LFT Art. 61, approved March 2026, phased in through 2030.
  • PTU — Constitución Política Art. 123-A fr. IX; LFT Art. 117-131. 10% of pre-tax profits, with the 2021 outsourcing-reform individual cap at the higher of three months of salary or the worker’s three-year PTU average.

Primary sources (state ISN): Each state’s Ley de Hacienda (or equivalent fiscal law) as in force on the publication date. Rates verified state-by-state in May 2026.

FX assumption: USD/MXN at $17.50 for USD equivalencies. This is a working planning rate as of May 2026 and not a forecast; for hiring decisions, use the spot rate at the time of contracting.

Calculations: All employer-cost line items are computed using the SBC integration factor for a year-one employee (15 days of aguinaldo + 25% prima vacacional on 12 days of vacation, yielding an integration factor of approximately 1.0493). Risk Class 2 (1.13%) is used as the default IMSS risk premium for all four representative roles; manufacturing and field roles should be re-modeled at their actual CIIU classification. Federal contributions (IMSS, INFONAVIT, CV) are capped at the 25-UMA SBC ceiling ($87,983/month in 2026) per LSS Art. 28 — this binds for the Operations Manager column at $90,000 MXN gross.

Live, updated calculator: This report is computed from the same dataset that powers the Mexico Labor Cost Calculator. The calculator is updated each February when INEGI publishes the new UMA, and annually thereafter as state ISN rates and the CV phase advance.

About Start-Ops Mexico

Start-Ops Mexico is a REPSE-registered Employer of Record and full-service market-entry partner for foreign companies operating in Mexico. Based in Guadalajara, Jalisco, the firm has spent five years specializing exclusively in Mexico — not as one country on a global EOR platform, but as the only country it serves.

Start-Ops’s services span company formation, EOR, payroll, accounting, tax compliance, recruiting, visas, and fractional CFO support. Foreign clients use Start-Ops to hire and operate in Mexico without forming a Mexican entity, to stay compliant with the 2021 outsourcing reform and REPSE requirements, and to get on-the-ground human relationships instead of ticket queues.

Industries served include software development, digital marketing, aerospace, automotive, medical devices, electronics, mining, and textiles. Clients are predominantly US-headquartered, with engagements ranging from one-employee EOR placements to full-stack expansion programs.

Mexico Labor Cost Calculator (live, free): https://start-ops.com.mx/tools/mexico-labor-cost-calculator.html

Book a meeting: https://start-ops.com.mx/land/book-a-meeting/

— Roberto Cornejo, Founder & CEO, Start-Ops Mexico

FOR JOURNALISTS

SIX QUOTABLE HEADLINE LINES (LIFT VERBATIM)

  1. “The gap between Mexican gross salary and the fully-loaded cost of employment is 30 to 34 percent before PTU — or 40 to 44 percent with the 10% profit share. US buyers who model the salary number alone are off by tens of thousands of dollars per hire per year.” — Roberto Cornejo, Start-Ops Mexico
  2. “By 2030, hiring five employees in Mexico will cost what hiring six costs today. The 40-hour workweek reform is the largest forward-looking cost movement nearshoring buyers aren’t pricing in.”
  3. “The single most-common mistake we see in US buyers’ models is using the 2030 final-state pension rate instead of the 2026 phased rate — and applying it to every worker regardless of UMA tier. A minimum-wage worker pays 4.799% in 2026, not 7.513%, and not 11.875%.”
  4. “Baja California’s payroll tax is more than double Chiapas’s. For a 50-person team at the senior-developer level, that’s roughly $850,000 MXN per year in employer tax alone.”
  5. “The UMA went up 3.75 percent in 2026. Every IMSS contribution line is indexed to it. Anyone who budgeted Mexican labor in 2025 is mispriced in 2026.”
  6. “Mexico’s general minimum wage has risen 26.6 percent in two years — from $248.93 to $315.04 per day, or a monthly floor of $9,451 MXN. The arbitrage story is real, but it is no longer the ‘cheap labor’ story of a decade ago.”

THREE CHART IDEAS FOR VISUAL DESKS

  • Map of Mexico shaded by 2026 ISN rate — Four states at 2.00% (Chiapas, Colima, Guerrero, Morelos), one at 4.25% (Baja California), bulk at 3.00%. Strong visual story about regional tax differentiation.
  • Stacked-bar comparison: gross salary vs. all-in cost, for the four representative roles. Each bar split into salary / IMSS / INFONAVIT / CV / ISN / aguinaldo / prima. Makes the 34-41% burden immediately legible.
  • Line chart of CV employer rate, 2023-2030, top tier (4.01+ UMA). Climbing line from 4.241% to 11.875% with a marker on 2026 at 7.513%. Tells the “this isn’t done yet” story in one image.

THREE ANGLES FOR FOLLOW-UP COVERAGE

  • Manufacturing focus: Risk Class 4-5 employers (medical devices, electronics, automotive) face IMSS risk premiums 4-7 percentage points higher than the office-work default. How does this change the IMMEX/nearshoring math for higher-risk industries?
  • Tech focus: Senior developer cost in Guadalajara, Monterrey, and Mexico City — three of the largest tech labor pools — versus equivalent US roles. Is the arbitrage still there in 2026? (Yes, but it’s tighter than the headlines suggest.)
  • Regional focus: The four 2.00% ISN states (Chiapas, Colima, Guerrero, Morelos) versus the 3.00% mainstream. Talent density and infrastructure tradeoffs that aren’t visible in the tax line.

Press contact: roberto@start-ops.com.mx

Citation format: Start-Ops Mexico, “The 2026 Mexico Labor Cost Index: State-by-State Total Cost of Employment for US Companies,” May 2026. https://start-ops.com.mx/research/2026-mexico-labor-cost-index/

Starting operations in Mexico?

Price Request